Here's what the summer of 2025 taught investors about patience…

From the desk of Miles Everson:

Happy midweek!

I hope you’re all doing well today.

In my “The Independent Investor” articles, I write investing-related tips with hopes to help you boost your investment portfolios and manage your finances well.

Today, let me share with you an important coaching comment by my friend and colleague, Professor Joel Litman.

Keep reading below to know more.

In hindsight, it’s easy to forget just how intense the pressure once felt.

Markets were restless. Political voices were loud. Investors were eager for relief.

… and yet, in the late summer of 2025, the most important signals weren’t coming from press conferences or market rallies; they were buried in the data.

At the time, Professor Joel Litman —Chairman and CEO of Valens Research and Chief Investment Officer of Altimetry Financial Research —argued that the real story wasn’t about who was demanding action, but about what the numbers were still refusing to justify.

At the time, Professor Joel Litman —Chairman and CEO of Valens Research and Chief Investment Officer of Altimetry Financial Research —argued that the real story wasn’t about who was demanding action, but about what the numbers were still refusing to justify.

Nearly a year later, that distinction remains one of the most instructive lessons for investors navigating monetary policy cycles.

In August 2025, retail and food-services sales data from the Chicago Federal Reserve showed a 0.3% decline in the final week of July 2025.

At the time, many market participants brushed it off as noise—a rounding error in an otherwise “resilient” economy.

Professor Litman saw it differently . He emphasized that economic slowdowns rarely announce themselves dramatically. Instead, they emerge quietly, in marginal pullbacks and behavioral shifts that only become obvious once confidence has already turned.

For investors reviewing that period now, the data reads less like an anomaly and more like an early signal of a consumer under sustained pressure from inflation, higher borrowing costs, and declining purchasing power.

The more consequential development, however, came from beneath the surface of headline employment figures.

Revisions to the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) suggested that 2024 job growth may have been overstated by as much as 75,000 jobs per month.

Back then, this revelation challenged one of the market’s most relied-upon assumptions: That the labor market remained unambiguously strong .

Professor Litman warned that when labor data is revised downward at that scale, policy risks being calibrated to an economy that no longer exists. In retrospect, that concern explains why debates over overtightening gained momentum later in 2025.

For investors, the episode reinforced a familiar but often ignored lesson:

By mid-2025, monetary policy had become openly politicized. Public pressure from President Donald Trump for immediate rate cuts collided with Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell’s insistence on patience.

Professor Litman framed this standoff as less about personalities and more about institutional credibility. According to him, central banks lose their effectiveness the moment markets believe policy is driven by pressure rather than evidence.

From today’s vantage point, it’s clear why Powell resisted. Yielding too early would have risked validating inflation expectations at precisely the wrong moment.

Inflation: The Constraint That Refused to Fade on Schedule

Despite cooling growth indicators, core inflation remained above the Fed’s 2% target throughout much of 2025.

Professor Litman highlighted a nuance that many investors underestimated at the time: Even with benchmark rates in the 4.25% to 4.5% range, real rates were only modestly restrictive once inflation was accounted for.

In other words, policy wasn’t nearly as tight as markets believed.

Another signal Professor Litman flagged in 2025 looks even more telling in retrospect: The resurgence of speculative behavior .

Meme stocks, cryptocurrencies, and other high-risk assets were surging again—not because fundamentals had improved, but because investors believed policy relief was imminent.

To Professor Litman, this wasn’t a sign of economic health; it was evidence that financial conditions were already loosening psychologically.

One of the most striking moments of 2025 was the rare double dissent from Fed Governors Michelle Bowman and Christopher Waller—the first such occurrence in over 30 years.

At the time, many interpreted it as a sign that Powell was losing control. Professor Litman took a more measured view, though. According to him, dissent reflected debate, not breakdown.

While concerns about overtightening were valid, the broader committee remained unconvinced that the labor market had deteriorated enough to justify a pivot. Wage growth was slowing, but unemployment remained historically low.

That balance explains why policy held steady longer than markets expected.

Throughout late 2025, investors positioned aggressively for rate cuts. Risk assets rallied on the assumption that the Fed would eventually blink.

Professor Litman cautioned against that certainty as Powell had consistently shown a willingness to tolerate short-term discomfort in pursuit of long-term stability.

With the benefit of hindsight, the mispricing wasn’t about direction but about timing. Policy eventually responds to data, but rarely on the market’s preferred schedule.

The Enduring Lesson for Investors

From a June 2026 perspective, Professor Litman’s August 2025 analysis stands out not because it predicted a single outcome, but because it framed the decision-making process correctly.

Political pressure mattered. Market expectations mattered. Internal debate mattered.

… but none of them mattered more than the data.

For investors, the takeaway is enduring:

… and when everyone is watching the headlines, it’s often the quiet revisions, small declines, and behavioral shifts that end up mattering most.

Hope you’ve found this week’s insights interesting and helpful.

Stay tuned for next Wednesday’s The Independent Investor!

America's debt debate is back in the headlines.

Learn more about America’s debt equation in next week’s article!